Beholder or Beholden?


Image credit

While I was listening to the recent Congressional Hearing that is supposedly “in aid of legislation,” what caught my attention was what one lawmaker said among other things that were said during that hearing. I will not write anymore about the apparent questionable (read: malicious) line of questioning that our “honorable” lawmakers employed. Our netizens already had a field day. 

That lawmaker intoned, “Truth is in the eye of the beholder.”

Now that’s an interesting play of words. The original saying says, “Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.” 
A beholder is an observer: someone who gains awareness of things through the senses, especially sight. If beauty is in the eye of the beholder, then the person who is observing gets to decide what is beautiful. A common saying is “Beauty is in the eye of the beholder,” which means beauty doesn’t exist on its own but is created by observers. [1]
Image credit

What the lawmaker said is in effect another way of saying, “What’s true for you may not be true for me.” Now, I agree that what may be beautiful for one person may not be to another person. But truth is different from beauty. Whether we agree with it or not, whether we appreciate it or not, we don’t get to decide what’s truth or not truth. We don’t create truth. Truth is truth. 
…truth is absolute—an objective reality. Truth isn’t personal, and it doesn’t belong to me or to you. Whether everyone, or most, or few, or nobody believes it, truth is what matched up with what’s real. In other words, It’s true, so that settles it, whether or not I believe it. … “Truth is what matches reality.” Or again, “Truth matches the facts.” … Another way to describe truth is to say, “Truth is telling it like it is.” What we claim to be true must match the way things really are. [2]
Image credit

The fact of truth is different from the act of appreciating or accepting the truth. For example, the fact that a swimming pool is 10-foot deep is the truth. (Or to those who would insist on the metric system, 3.05 meters.) Whether it’s too deep or shallow depends on whether the person diving into it knows how to swim or not. That’s the appreciation or acceptance of the truth. 

Why do we need to know about this? It’s because our Lord Jesus made a truth claim. He declared, 
I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me. (John 14:6, ESV. Emphasis added.)
If truth depends on how we see it, then even if Jesus claimed to be the way to God the Father, there could be other ways to Him. If truth depends on whether we appreciate it or not, even if He claimed to be the truth, then there could be other sources of truth out there regarding God. If truth depends on whether we accept it or not, even if He claimed to be the life, then there could be other sources of eternal life. His declaration would not make sense at all if we agree that truth is in the eye of the beholder. 

You may choose to believe or not to believe in the Lord. That’s up to you. But the truth remains: if Jesus is not your way, you are lost. If He is not your truth, you are in error. If He is not your life, then you are good as dead. 

Image credit

The beholder is free to see the truth the way he sees it. But that doesn’t change the truth. We are actually beholden to the truth. We are responsible for how we would respond to the truth, not for defining or deciding what is truth.

 Brothers and sisters, we are beholden to the truth, not just beholders of it.

 [1] “Beholder,” Vocabulary.com, https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/beholder, accessed November 26, 2016. Emphasis added.

 [2] Norman L. Geisler and Patty Tunnicliffe, Reasons For Belief: Easy-to-Understand Answers to 10 Essential Questions (Bloomington, MN: Bethany House, 2013), 16, 17. Italics theirs.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

“Ubus-ubos Biyaya, Bukas Nakatunganga”

Image
That’s what my mother always told us when we were still kids. (Translation: “You spend everything today, you will have nothing tomorrow.” ) Image source: So, What's New ? Dionie did just that. Last April 2008, he won PHP14,125,032 in the Lotto 6/42 draw. Excitedly, he “lived the life of a millionaire, something he had been longing to experience. He lived in a P4-million house in a posh subdivision, drove around in a sports utility vehicle [which he bought the very same day he claimed his prize] , and gave goodwill money, ranging P1,000 to P 850,000, to relatives and friends. He also gambled daily, womanized, and went on regular drinking sprees.” (Source: Manila Bulletin ) He estimated that he squandered a minimum of P100,000 almost every day. He also lent money even to people he did not really know. “I just gave them and told them not to pay me back.” (Ibid) His bank had to issue him a special card so he can withdraw huge amounts of money quickly from the automated teller m
Read more

God Knows Judas Not Pay

In the National Geographic Magazine (May 2006 issue), in its cover story, The Judas Gospel , Professor Eliane Pagels of Princeton University claimed that the so-called gospel of Judas “ changes the history of early Christianity. ” Even UP Professor Randy David took notice of the Judas Gospel: “Strictly from a sociological standpoint, I think the discovery of the Gospel of Judas makes Christianity a far more interesting religion than what centuries of metaphysical theology has made of it.” (A Gospel for the Postmodern, Phil. Daily Inquirer, April 16, 2006) That’s why I spoke in our Young Pro Fellowship a few days ago on God Knows Judas Not Pay (A Biblical Response on the Judas Gospel). I believe opportunities like this hype on the Judas Gospel or the Da Vinci Code opens a door for us to share the true Gospel. For those who did not attend last Thursday, let me share briefly why we reject the Judas gospel. I came up with the acronym J-U-D-A-S. J udas was portrayed as a traitor in the Bibl
Read more

“Don’t drink the Kool-Aid!”

Image
Forty years ago, this expression became known as a description of blind obedience.   Source: Los Angeles Times On November 18, 1978, members of Peoples Temple, a cult group in Guyana, drank Kool-Aid drink laced with cyanide to commit a mass suicide “at the behest of their charismatic but paranoid leader, Jim Jones”. [1] According to the Encyclopaedia Britannica , “The death toll exceeded 900, including some 300 age 17 and under, making the incident one of the largest mass deaths in American history. ”  [2]  What made those people submit to such atrocity? According to Stella Morabito, a senior contributor to The Federalist online magazine, Peoples Temple is “Exhibit A… [of]  the dangers of the cult mindset or how vulnerable all people are to cult tactics.”  [3] She pointed out that, Coercive persuasion has immense power to shape and twist the human mind.  …[Jones’] utopian preaching of a humane world in which all lived happily in harmony resonated with the
Read more