The Boy Who Cried Pork (Part 2)

Senator Jinggoy Estrada delivering his privilege speech last September 26, 2013. Image source: Inquirer News
Seemingly emboldened by the apparent success of his so-called ‘peanut butter defense,’ Senator Jinggoy Estrada once again had the nerve to use his position as a bully pulpit. 

(According to Edilberto C. de Jesus, professor emeritus at the Asian Institute of Management, “Litigation lawyers, when confronted with damning evidence, joke that the respondent’s recourse is to hide behind the ‘Peanut Butter Defense’—spread the blame. One website condensed the thrust of this strategy thus: ‘I am a thief, but I am not the only one.’” [Inquirer. Emphasis added.])  

In his privilege speech before, he hid behind his parliamentary immunity to defend himself from the accusation that he (along with Senators Bong Revilla and Juan Ponce Enrile) sliced a chunk of his pork barrel for himself though fake non-governmental organizations (NGOs). 
Senator Estrada grilling COA Chair Grace Pulido-Tan during the budget hearing. Image source: Rappler

Just the other day, he bullied—to no avail—Commission on Audit (COA) Chairperson Grace Pulido-Tan during the Senate budget hearing last Wednesday (October 16). 
Estrada told Tan, “Bahala ang implementing agency. Nag-endorso kami ng NGO. It happened to be bogus. ‘Di naman namin alam. Dapat you call their attention, tinigil ang pagpapadala ng pera. Bakit kami ang sisihin?” (It’s up to the implementing agency. We endorsed an NGO. It happened to be bogus. We did not know. You should call their attention, stop the release of funds. Why blame us?) Tan said, “We are not blaming you. It was the implementing agencies that said they have no hand in the implementation. They should know from you that you do not believe them.” (Rappler. Italics theirs. Emphasis mine.)
Yes, Tan added, “The implementing agency is responsible for funds.” (Ibid) However, she disagreed with Estrada’s claim that he is not responsible, too. “They are directly, primarily liable but it also says in the law that they are not the only ones liable but everyone involved in the use of the funds.” (Ibid)

But Estrada held on to his shaky ground. 
“Ganito lang iyon eh. Alam na pala nilang bawal o bogus. Bakit sila tanggap nang tanggap ng pondo galing sa [endorsement ng] senador?” (It’s this simple. They already know it’s illegal or the NGO is bogus. Why do they keep receiving money from the senator’s endorsement?) Tan said, “Dapat po kayo magtanong.” (Then you should ask them.) (Ibid. Italics theirs)
At the very least, Estrada failed to exercise due diligence or was negligent in his endorsements. The fact that he admitted he doesn’t have a clue that the beneficiary was bogus did not help his cause at all. He just dug his grave even deeper.
Image source: Inquirer News
Estrada’s childish antics apparently showed his false sense of entitlement. 

By doing so, he actually sent the not-so-subliminal message (read: threat) that the COA should back off. That these honorable lawmakers are untouchables. That no one should investigate these lawmakers or else their budget would be held hostage. 

Because of Estrada’s obvious tantrum, the senate hearing did not even get to discuss the budget at all. Sadly, it unduly delayed the approval of the budget of COA. Since it’s deferred for another time, the committee would be spending again for another hearing. Such a waste of the taxpayers’ money all because Estrada thought he could clear his name in that hearing. He tried in vain to exact his revenge on Tan and the COA at our expense! 
"LET'S PARTY. Janet Lim-Napoles [the alleged pork barrel scam queen], left (standing), rubs elbows with senators Jinggoy Estrada and Bong Revilla in this photo taken during a party in Estrada's favorite hangout in San Juan." Caption and image source: Rappler 
Estrada forgot that the right forum to do just that is in the graft court, not in his turf. In my opinion, if there’s any morsel of delicadeza (sense of honor and shame) left in him, he should inhibit himself from any and all budget hearing involving Tan and the COA. 

That is, if there’s anything left of it at all.

Comments

  1. Anonymous12:07 PM

    ang unggoy walang kahihiyan. hanggang makakapagnakaw wala siyang pakialam. kaya si junggoy ay unggoy.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

God Knows Judas Not Pay

In the National Geographic Magazine (May 2006 issue), in its cover story, The Judas Gospel , Professor Eliane Pagels of Princeton University claimed that the so-called gospel of Judas “ changes the history of early Christianity. ” Even UP Professor Randy David took notice of the Judas Gospel: “Strictly from a sociological standpoint, I think the discovery of the Gospel of Judas makes Christianity a far more interesting religion than what centuries of metaphysical theology has made of it.” (A Gospel for the Postmodern, Phil. Daily Inquirer, April 16, 2006) That’s why I spoke in our Young Pro Fellowship a few days ago on God Knows Judas Not Pay (A Biblical Response on the Judas Gospel). I believe opportunities like this hype on the Judas Gospel or the Da Vinci Code opens a door for us to share the true Gospel. For those who did not attend last Thursday, let me share briefly why we reject the Judas gospel. I came up with the acronym J-U-D-A-S. J udas was portrayed as a traitor in the Bibl...
Read more

“Ubus-ubos Biyaya, Bukas Nakatunganga”

Image
That’s what my mother always told us when we were still kids. (Translation: “You spend everything today, you will have nothing tomorrow.” ) Image source: So, What's New ? Dionie did just that. Last April 2008, he won PHP14,125,032 in the Lotto 6/42 draw. Excitedly, he “lived the life of a millionaire, something he had been longing to experience. He lived in a P4-million house in a posh subdivision, drove around in a sports utility vehicle [which he bought the very same day he claimed his prize] , and gave goodwill money, ranging P1,000 to P 850,000, to relatives and friends. He also gambled daily, womanized, and went on regular drinking sprees.” (Source: Manila Bulletin ) He estimated that he squandered a minimum of P100,000 almost every day. He also lent money even to people he did not really know. “I just gave them and told them not to pay me back.” (Ibid) His bank had to issue him a special card so he can withdraw huge amounts of money quickly from the automated teller m...
Read more

Detour, Not A Dead End

Image
A dead end is “an end of a road or a passage from which no exit is possible.” Image credit A dead end, according to a dictionary, is “an end of a road or a passage from which no exit is possible.”  According to another dictionary , it is “a situation, plan, or way of doing something that leads to nothing further.” Screenshot from Merriam-Webster online dictionary There were times in my life when I thought I was in a dead end.  Impasse. No way out. Caught between the proverbial rock and a hard place. I was like Moses. There’s the Red Sea in front of me and the Egyptian army behind me. Only this time, I can’t part the sea.  I failed. Many times. My dreams became a nightmare. And my nightmare came to pass. (Of course, I can always blame others. The fact is, it’s not entirely my fault. But why waste time blaming? So, I’ll just take responsibility for where and why I failed.) I got burned out. I got myself into stress-related disorder when I pressure...
Read more